IL: New Procedures re Payoff Letters, Cook County Orders Approving
Sales, and Cook County Evictions
by Jill Rein
Pierce & Associates, P.C. - USFN Member (IL)
Illinois — Payoff Letters
One of the new amendments to the Illinois mortgage foreclosure law
concerns payoff letters. Under the new law, when a borrower, or the
borrower’s agent, makes a written request for payoff figures, a
payoff statement containing the following must be delivered to the
borrower, or the borrower’s agent, within 10 business days of
receipt of the request and it must contain the following
information:
▪ The total
outstanding balance of the borrower’s obligation as of the date
the letter is prepared;
▪ Information necessary to
calculate the payoff amount on a per diem basis for 30 days after the
date of preparation, or the date of sale, whichever is
shorter;
▪ Estimated charges (that are
stated as estimated charges) that the mortgagee reasonably believes may
be incurred within 30 days of the date of preparation;
▪ The loan number;
▪ The address of the
mortgagee;
▪ The telephone number of the
mortgagee;
▪ If a banking organization or
corporation –
o the name of the
department preparing the figures;
o the phone number of
the department preparing the
figures;
and
o The facsimile number
of the department preparing
the
figures.
Failure to
comply with the provisions of this section can subject the mortgagee to
actual damages, or a $500 fine if no actual damages are sustained, for
each violation.
Cook County Courtroom
Procedures
On November 11, 2008, the Cook County Illinois Foreclosure Courts came
out with revised courtroom procedures. Following are new requirements
under these procedures:
Additional Information Needed for Scheduling of Orders Approving
Sale— In order to schedule an order approving
sale, the motion and the corresponding order must contain information
setting forth the type of property (single family/multi-unit/individual
unit in multi-unit/commercial) and the date of the last inspection
(occupancy/tenant check).
The type of
inspection the court is requiring is detailed written proof of a
diligent attempt to ascertain the names of the current occupants of the
property. A drive-by or an inspection that simply advises that the
property is occupied is insufficient; the inspection must include proof
of attempts made to ascertain the names of the current occupants of the
property.
The inspection must take place and the results provided to your lawyer
prior to scheduling the order approving sale. Accordingly, this
inspection needs to take place right around the sale date. The
author’s firm can set-up, manage, and monitor this required
inspection/occupancy check with outside vendors, ensuring that the
inspections are done correctly, timely, and in compliance with the
court’s rules. If a lender or servicer chooses to handle these
inspections itself, it must provide its attorneys with the required
information, at the required time, to enable scheduling a timely order
approving sale.
Evictions — Under these new
courtroom procedures, a law firm that has been referred an
eviction, but that did not handle the foreclosure, must file an
additional appearance or present the court with a substitution of
counsel order before that law firm can place the order for possession
with the sheriff to evict. To accomplish either of these options, the
law firm hired to handle the eviction must file and schedule a motion
for leave to file the additional appearance or substitution of counsel,
and appear before the court to have the motion heard. Depending on the
availability of court dates before the different judges, this new
procedure may delay the placing of some eviction orders with the
sheriff. An additional appearance or substitution of counsel order is
not needed if this author’s firm is proceeding with a separate
forcible detainer action as opposed to placing the order of possession
from the foreclosure case with the sheriff.
Additionally, this author’s firm has learned from the
sheriff’s office that it has put some new internal procedures in
place. When an eviction is placed with the sheriff’s office, the
first action it takes is to send two deputies to “post” the
property. The date for this is not given, and it is a preliminary step.
The purpose of this initial visit is to post notices on the
property advising of the pending eviction, not to attempt an actual
eviction. The second step is a second visit to the property (this
is on the date given as the initial lock-out date). If the individuals
named on the order are in the property, they will be evicted; however,
if no one is home, the property will be posted again. Also, if
individuals are in the property who are not named in the order for
possession, the eviction will be canceled (at that time a forcible
detainer action must be pursued with the names of the new
occupants).
If no one was
home the second time, the sheriff will visit a third time and the
same thing will happen as on the second visit: If the individuals
named on the order are in the property, they will be evicted; however,
if no one is home, the property will be posted again. Also, if
individuals are in the property who are not named in the order, the
eviction will be canceled (at that time a forcible detainer action must
be pursued with the names of the new occupants).
If no one was
home the third time, the sheriff will visit a fourth time. This
time, if the individuals named on the order are in the property or no
one is home, an eviction will be completed; however, if individuals are
in the property who are not named in the order, the eviction will be
canceled (at that time a forcible detainer action must be pursued with
the names of the new occupants).
The time
between each visit is at least seven days. This is a new process for the
sheriff’s office, which it plans to evaluate after a few
months.
©
Copyright 2009 USFN. All rights reserved.
January e-Update
| Payoff Letters, Courtroom Procedures, |
|