-
-
-
Bankruptcy
Legislation -- House Resolution 3609, introduced 9/20/07 as the Emergency Home Ownership and
Mortgage Equity Protection Act of 2007, seeks to amend 11
U.S.C. §§ 109(h), 506(b), 1322(b), 1325(a), and 1328.
MBA's opposition paper: Oppose
Cramdown Legislation.
- Bankruptcy Filings by Lenders -- Click this
topic for info re Ch. 11 filings by various lenders: including
Aegis Mortgage Corporation, American Home Mortgage,
Copperfield, Delta Financial Corporation, Fieldstone Mortgage Co.,
First Magnus Financial Corporation, First NLC Financial Services,
Fremont General Corporation, HomeBanc, MILA Inc., Mortgage Lenders
Network USA, New Century Mortgage Corp., Oak Street Mortgage, Ownit,
People's Choice Financial Corporation, ResMAE Mortgage Corporation,
and Southstar Funding
-
-
-
-
-
USFN Contact Information
For questions, suggestions or feedback on this area,
please contact any of the following people:
Michael S. Arnovitz, Esq., Chair, USFN Bankruptcy
Committee marnovitz@reimerlaw.com
Dan West, Esq., Vice Chair, USFN Bankruptcy
Committee danw@southlaw.com
R. Hillary Willett, Esq., Director of Publications and
Services, USFN hwillett@usfn.org
For links to Bankruptcy Court websites, see the federal
judiciary site at USFN's Industry
Links.
Bankruptcy News by Topic
& State
AUTOMATIC STAY
RELIEF
FL: In re Striblin, 349
B.R. 301 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2006), re new exception to automatic
stay [§ 362(b)(24)] and its applicability only to post-petition
transfers initiated by the debtor. In re
Covert, 355 B.R. 327 (Bankr. N.D. Fla. 2006), re denial of motion
to extend automatic stay where local rules require notice within 5 days
of filing petition, and notice was actually given on the 30th
day.
MA: In re Jumpp, BAP No. MW
06-031 (12/28/06), vacates BK Court's order denying the Debtor's
Motion for Determination and Motion to Reimpose the Automatic
Stay. In re Jumpp and In re Okyere, Memorandum of Decision re whether
termination of stay under § 362(c)(3) applies to the property
of the estate as well as to the debtor (Bankr. D. Mass. June 23,
2006).
NY: In re
Murphy, 346 B.R. 79 (Bankr. S. D. N. Y. 2006) --
Creditor applied, ex parte, for a "comfort order" confirming that the
automatic stay terminated 30 days after the petition was filed. Court
was limited to issuing bare comfort order and could not award attorneys'
fees to creditor.
NC: In re Brandon, 349 B.R. 130
(Bankr. M.D.N.C. 2006) -- Automatic Termination of Stay in case of
repeat filer terminated stay as to property of the debtor but
not as to property of the estate.
TN: In re Wilson, 336 B.R.
338 (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. 2005), re denial of motion to extend automatic
stay where debtors failed to give at least 20 days' notice as required
by local rules.
WA: In re Coan, Case No.
05-11441-PCW13 (Bankr. E.D. Wash. Jan. 13, 2006) -- Memorandum Decision
re Debtor's Motion for Order Extending the Automatic Stay.
CREDIT COUNSELING
REQUIREMENT
8th Circuit: In re
Hedquist, 342 B.R. 295 (Bankr. 8th Cir. BAP 2006)
CO: In re Tulper, __ B.R. __,
2006 WL 1651710 (Bankr. D. Col. 5/22/06).
FL: In re
Petit-Louis, 338 B.R. 132, 2006 WL 1793642
(Bankr. S.D. Fla. 3/1/06). Order on debtor's petition of exigent
circumstances that merits waiver of buget and credit
counseling.
In re Davenport, 2005 WL 3292700 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. December 6,
2005)
GA: In re Ross, 338 B.R. 134 (Bankr. N.D. Ga.
2006)
ID: In re Rodriguez, 336
B.R. 462 (Bankr. D. Idaho 2005)
LA & MS: On 10/4/05, the
Executive Office of the U.S. Trustee issued a temporary waiver of the
credit counseling requirement for "bankruptcy filers" in Louisiana and
the Southern District of Mississippi as a result of Hurricane Katrina.
This waiver has been extended once already. Latest
update as of 9/17/07: R. Michael Bolen, U.S. Trustee for Region
5, has determined that the requirements for credit counseling and debtor
education courses, which had been waived for the So. District of MS,
will apply to bankruptcy cases filed on or after 3/10/08. The same
requirements will likewise apply to cases filed in the Middle and
Western Districts of Louisiana. In the Eastern District of Louisiana,
the waiver will continue through 9/30/08 unless subsequently
modified.
MD: In re Childs, 335 B.R.
623 (Bankr. D. Md. 2005)
MA: In re Gould, 348 B.R.
78 (Bankr. D. Mass. 2006) - Moving for relief from stay under §
362(d)(4) where debt was incurred as part of "scheme to delay, hinder
and defraud."
MO: In re
Talib, 335 B.R. 417 (Bankr. W.D. Mo. 2005); In re
Gee, 332 B.R. 602 (Bankr. W.D. Mo. 2005)
OH: In re Cleaver, 333
B.R. 430 (Bankr. S.D. Ohio 2005)
PA: In re DiPinto, 336
B.R. 693 (Bankr. E.D. Pa. 2006)
TX: Hersch v. USA, et
al. [N.D. Tex., Civil Action
No. 3:05-CV-2330-N (July 26, 2006)]. Memorandum opionion and order
granting defendants' motion to dismiss. However, among other things, the
court held that BK Code § 526(a)(4)'s restrictions on legal
advice violated the debtor's First Amendment rights. Also see In re
Sosa, 336 B.R. 113 (Bankr. W.D. Tex. 2005)
VT: In re Hess, 347 B.R. 489 (Bankr. D.
Vt. 2006) where court distinguished between temporary "exemption"
and permanent "waiver" in NOT dismissing
case. In re
Stockwell, __ B.R. __ (Bankr. D.
Vt. 4/27/06).
VA: In re
Star, 341 B.R. 830 (Bankr. E.D. Va. 4/24/06); In re
Watson, 332 B.R. 740 (Bankr. E.D. Va. 2005)
IN REM
RELIEF
MEANS
TESTING
NJ: In re Fox, Opinion that the debtor,
"having converted her case from one under chapter 13 to one under
chapter 7, is not subject to the means test under the plain language of
§ 707 (b)(1) and is, thus, not required to file a Form B22A under
Rule 1007 (b)(4)." (Bankr. D.N.J. June 1, 2007).
MISC. (coverage includes local standing orders,
constitutional questions, payment applications, homestead exemption
issues)
U.S. Supreme Court: Marrama
v. Citizens Bank of Massachusetts, 549 U.S. __ (decided Feb. 21,
2007). 5-4 decision, ruling that a "bad faith" Ch. 7 debtor does
not have an absolute right to convert case to Ch.
13.
CT: Zelotes v. Martini (Acting
U.S.Trustee, Region 2), 352 B.R. 17 -
Plaintiff brought action challenging the constitutionality of a
provision of the BAPCPA: 11 U.S.C. § 526(a)(4). Defendant's
Motion to Dismiss denied (Nov. 7, 2006). Also see Zelotes
v. Adams, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13236, 2007 WL 638331 in
which the court granted summary judgment against the U.S.
Trustee, holding that § 526(a)(4) is unconstitutional as
applied to bankruptcy attorneys.
FL: In re Sanchez; Donald F. Walton, U.S. Trustee v.
Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. -- Memorandum Opinion
and Order Granting Countrywide's Motion to Dismiss (Bankr. S.D.Fla. Oct.
2, 2008) Decision re homestead exemption cap under BAPCPA: In
re Kaplan (S. District of Florida, Oct. 6, 2005).
KS: Bankruptcy Court's Standing
Order 08-1 re conduit mortgage payments in Ch. 13 (issued
July 22, 2008). Bankruptcy Court's Standing Order 07-3 re monthly statements to
debtors (issued Nov. 2, 2007). Note: Standing Order 07-2, issued
Sept. 10, 2007, was repealed.
LA: Bankruptcy Court (Eastern
District) Administrative Order 2008-2 (Section A)
issued on May 8, 2008, by Hon. Elizabeth W. Magner regarding
"procedures required of all creditors that maintain an escrow for
debtors with cases pending before the [subject court]."
MA: In re Nosek,
Ameriquest Mortgage Company, Appellant, v. Nosek, Appellee (1st
Cir. Oct. 3, 2008) -- Decision vacating
district court's judgment affirming the bankruptcy court's judgment in
the adversary proceeding and remanding that proceeding to the bankruptcy
court for dismissal and also vacating the district court's judgment
affirming the confirmation of the debtor's third amended plan and
remanding that matter to the bankruptcy court with instructions to
vacate its order confirming that plan.
In re Leung, 2006 WL 3519328 (Bankr. D.
Mass. 2006) Wife's transfer of residence to debtor
triggers BAPCPA cap on homestead exemption.
MN: Milavetz, Gallop &
Milavetz P.A. v. U.S., Docket No. 05-CV-2626 (12/7/06), rules that
§§ 526(a)(4) and 528(a)(4), (b)(2) are unconstitutional. Also
addresses §§ 526, 527 and 528 re required use of the
phrase "Debt Relief Agency" and concludes that it does not apply to
attorneys.
NV: Decision re homestead exemption
cap under BAPCPA: In
re Virissimo (Nevada, Oct. 31, 2005).
NJ: In re Rivera, Order re Rule 9011 Penalties
and Permanently Enjoining Certain Practices (Bankr. D.N.J. May
25, 2006). Also see In re Rivera, Opinion, __ B.R. __, 2006 WL
1516014 (Bankr. D.N.J. May 25, 2006).
BK Reform Bill Overview - Comprehensive BK Reform overview that continues to be
updated and expanded. Includes live links to other resources for further
information. (Last updated:
5/08)
Recent
Articles
[Back to Top]
Bankruptcy Chapter Overviews:
Chapters 7, 11, and 13
CHAPTER 7
A Chapter 7 Bankruptcy is a liquidation bankruptcy where all
non-exempt assets may be sold to pay creditors. An Interim Trustee is
selected from a panel of private Trustees to serve as the Trustee until
the Meeting of Creditors.
In a no asset proceeding, the Meeting of Creditors is normally the
only appearance that a debtor is required to make. The Trustee and
creditors may examine the debtor and the Trustee will ask questions
based upon review of the Statement and Schedules. After the
creditors’ meeting, the final event that occurs in a typical no
asset Chapter 7 is that an individual debtor or joint debtors will
receive a discharge. Receipt of a discharge will be automatic unless an
objection is filed to the discharge. The discharge legally relieves a
debtor of all dischargeable obligations, voids any existing judgments
and permanently enjoins the collection of any debt subject to the
discharge. Certain debts are specifically not dischargeable. In general,
these include secured debts, alimony and support payments.
If a Chapter 7 is an asset case, it is the Trustee’s duty to
liquidate and administer those assets. Often, if the cost of
administration exceeds the benefit that will ultimately be given to
creditors, an asset may be abandoned. It is the Trustee’s
obligation to determine whether assets should be liquidated. The Trustee
then submits a schedule of proposed distribution of assets to creditors
that needs Court approval.
CHAPTER 11
As with a Chapter 13, the goal of the Chapter 11 is for the Debtor to
successfully reorganize its affairs so that it may repay debt, retain
assets and remain in business. This is accomplished by a
debtor-in-possession proposing a Plan of reorganization and obtaining
its confirmation. The Chapter 11 Plan confirmation process is complex
and lengthy. In a Chapter 11, the creditors are able to vote for or
against the Plan. Chapter 11 may be filed by an individual who owes more
than the debt limits in a Chapter 13 or by a business which wishes to
continue operation. The debtor-in-possession is the functional
equivalent of a Trustee as they are authorized to conduct ordinary
business affairs without Court approval in most instances. The
debtor’s financial affairs are subject to constant monitoring and
the debtor is required to file operating reports on a monthly basis.
This is a regular report of the debtor’s ongoing post-petition
business operations and will advise the creditors and the Trustee if the
debtor is generating profits or losses during the proceeding.
The Chapter 11 Plan must place all creditors within classes and all
creditors in a given class must have claims that are substantially
similar. The Plan must specify which of the classes reimpaired under the
Plan and the treatment to be accorded to an impaired claim must be
described. The Plan must advise all parties how the Plan will be
performed.
When a Plan is filed, it is accompanied by a Disclosure Statement.
Votes may not be solicited from creditors until the Court approves the
Disclosure Statement. The Disclosure Statement must contain information
sufficient to enable a creditor or party-in-interest to determine
whether to vote for acceptance or rejection of the Plan. The Disclosure
Statement normally summarizes the Debtor’s progress during the
Chapter 11 proceeding, as well as disclosing all relative factors
leading up to the Debtor’s need to file bankruptcy. The Disclosure
Statement normally contains a summary of the Plan and describes the
practical effect of the Plan rather than its technical terms. Once the
Disclosure Statement has been approved by the Court, it is sent with the
Plan to all of the creditors along with a ballot for voting. Impaired
creditors with an allowed claim are entitled to vote for or against a
Plan. If a majority of the creditors in number and two-thirds in dollar
amount vote to accept the Plan, it will be confirmed. If less than a
majority of creditors in numbers or less than two-thirds in dollar
amount vote to accept the Plan, then a cramdown procedure will be
necessary to confirm the Plan over the rejection.
A confirmed Chapter 11 Plan acts as a new contract between the debtor
and all of its creditors. Confirmation re-vests the debtor will all
property of the estate free and clear of all liens and interest except
as provided for by the Plan. Confirmation also acts as a discharge to
all debts that arose before the date of confirmation. A Chapter 11
discharge is virtually identical to a Chapter 7 discharge. A discharge
will not be granted in a Chapter 11 where the debtor is liquidating its
assets through the Plan, until such liquidation is completed.
CHAPTER 13
Chapter 13 Bankruptcy is a reorganization proceeding where a debtor
will attempt to repay a debt and retain non-exempt assets or continue to
operate a business. Chapter 13 is a program for individuals with regular
income who have unsecured debt of less than $307,675.00 and secured debt
of $922,975.00. A debtor may attempt to repay debts over a period of
time, not to exceed 60 months. If the Chapter 13 Plan is successfully
performed, a Debtor will be able to retain non-exempt assets and will
receive a discharge from many of the obligations that would not be
dischargeable in a Chapter 7. A Chapter 13 is commenced by the filing of
a Bankruptcy Petition. In a Chapter 13 the Automatic Stay is applicable
to a co-debtor who is not in a bankruptcy proceeding. If a Chapter 13
debtor is engaged in business, the debtor is permitted to continue to
operate the business. The debtor’s post-petition earnings from
services are considered property of the estate.
The main component of a Chapter 13 proceeding is the Plan. The Plan
is, in essence, a new contract between the debtor and all of the
creditors. In order for a Chapter 13 Plan to be approved, it must be
approved at a Confirmation Hearing. Once a Chapter 13 Plan has been
confirmed, all creditors are bound by the terms of the Plan. Once
performance of a Chapter 13 Plan has been completed, then the debtor is
entitled to a discharge. A Chapter 13 debtor who has not fully completed
a Plan may still apply for a hardship discharge if the Court finds that
failure to complete the Plan is due to circumstances which the Debtor
should not be held accountable for and if the unsecured creditors have
received at least as much as they would have gotten in a Chapter 7
proceeding. A Chapter 13 discharge may be revoked if the Court finds
that the discharge was fraudulently obtained. Revocation must be sought
within one year of discharge.
[Back to Top]
Bankruptcy Terms Defined
Special thanks to Randall S. McHugh, Esq. (Reiner, Reiner &
Bendett, CT), and the USFN Bankruptcy Committee for assistance in
compiling the following glossary.
Abandonment:
A notice by the bankruptcy trustee that he/she has no interest in
keeping certain property as part of the bankruptcy estate. Once
abandonment occurs, ownership of the abandoned property reverts back to
the debtor subject to any secured claims against that property.
Adequate Protection Order:
A court order requiring the debtor to make payments to the secured
creditor, while the case is pending confirmation, to assure that the
creditor’s equity position is not worsened.
Automatic Stay:
See the Overview of the BK Reform Bill (BAPCPA) referenced
above, as well as relevant articles in the online Article Library,
for further information about the automatic stay. Upon filing the
bankruptcy petition Section 362(a) of the United States Bankruptcy Code
imposes an immediate and automatic stay of all collection activities
against either the debtor or the debtor’s property. Since the stay
is automatic it does not matter whether an action was taken against the
debtor or the debtor’s property without knowledge of the
bankruptcy. Any properties taken or monies collected while the automatic
stay was in effect must be returned to the debtor and all collection
activities commenced while the stay was in effect would be considered
void.
Chapter 7:
Chapter 7 is a liquidation, not a re-organization chapter. It allows a
debtor to get a quick discharge from his personal debt liability.
However, once a debtor receives a discharge under either Chapter 7, 11,
12 or 13 that debtor will not be eligible for a Chapter 7 discharge for
another six years. If sufficient equity exists after the debtor’s
exemption in any property, the Chapter 7 Trustee will endeavor to sell
the property to pay all the unsecured claims. Of all the chapters,
Chapter 7 is the easiest to obtain relief from the automatic stay. (see
Bankruptcy Chapter Overviews for more detailed information)
Chapter 11:
Chapter 11 is a reorganization chapter. Chapter 11 bankruptcies are
typically filed by corporations because corporations cannot file a
Chapter 13 to reorganize. Chapter 11 may also be filed by an individual,
especially one who does not meet the debt limitations imposed upon the
Chapter 13 debtor under Section 109(e) of the Bankruptcy Code. However,
rarely does an individual wage earner file Chapter 11 because it is very
expensive. The Chapter 11 plan usually pays each unsecured or under
secured creditor more than it would receive under a Chapter 7
liquidation. There is no statutory limit on how long the repayment
period can be. Further, the debtor receives its discharge upon
confirmation of the plan. Prior to confirmation the creditors submit
written ballots to the debtor’s attorney indicating whether the
creditor either accepts or rejects the plan. The creditors can decide on
how to cast their ballots after reviewing the disclosure statement
prepared by the debtor. The Disclosure Statement provides the creditors
with sufficient information about the debtor’s business and
financial affairs to make an informed decision as to how to vote on the
plan. (see Bankruptcy Chapter Overviews for more detailed
information)
Chapter 12:
Chapter 12 is a reorganization chapter. Chapter 12 provides relief for
family farmers whose debt limitations exceed those for a Chapter 13
filing. The code defines a family farmer as “an individual, or
individual and spouse, engaged in a farming operation whose aggregate
debts do not exceed $1,500,000.00, and not less than 80% of whose debts
arise out of a farming operation. Such individual or individual and
spouse must also receive more than 50% of his or their gross income from
farming operation.” The Chapter 12 allows the family farmer to
repay his debts through a plan not to exceed five years. With the
exception of the debt limitations and income requirements the Chapter 12
is similar to a Chapter 13.
Chapter 13:
The Chapter 13 is usually known as a wage earner reorganization. Under a
Chapter 13 plan of reorganization the debtor must pay all allowed
secured claims, priority claims and use his best efforts to pay a
dividend to unsecured creditors. The Chapter 13 allows a wage earner to
repay his debts through a plan not to exceed five years. Usually the
Chapter 13 plan operates to cure a mortgage default and decelerate any
accelerated loan. It acts as a type of forbearance agreement. The
debtor’s arrears are re-paid through the plan for a period up to
five years. At the same time the debtor is required to make regular
monthly mortgage payments. If the debtor makes all payments, then at the
end of the plan the debtor should be contractually current. If the
debtor completes all payments under the plan then he will be discharged
of all secured debts set forth in the plan and all pre- petition
unsecured debts. The debtor will not be liable for any discharged debts.
Chapter 13 plan will be confirmed if it is feasible and if it is the
debtor’s best efforts in paying his unsecured debts.(see
Bankruptcy Chapter Overviews for more detailed information)
Confirmation Hearing:
The hearing where the debtor’s proposed Chapter 11, 12 or 13 plan
is reviewed and either approved or denied by the bankruptcy judge. In a
Chapter 12 or 13 the plan will usually be confirmed if the Chapter 12 or
13 trustee recommends confirmation. In a Chapter 11 the plan will
usually be confirmed if there are enough ballots from the creditors
accepting said plan. However, in a Chapter 11 the plan can still be
confirmed even if many creditors reject the plan if the court finds that
the plan is in the best interests of the creditors.
Cramdown:
A cram down, also known as lien stripping, is a procedure frequently
utilized by debtors to bifurcate a creditor’s claim into a secured
and unsecured portion. Thereafter, the debtor will file a plan which
seeks to repay only the secured portion of the creditor’s claim.
Once the secured portion of the claim is paid the debtor will be
discharged from having to pay the unsecured portion. Cram downs are
generally allowed unless the debt owed to the creditor is secured solely
by property that is the debtor’s principal residence. If the
debtor is allowed to cram down the creditor’s mortgage, the debtor
will commence the procedure by filing a Section 506 motion also known as
a Motion to Determine Secured Status. Through this motion the court will
determine the fair market value of the property and will thereafter find
how much of the creditor’s claim is secured and how much is
unsecured. A cram down can occur in either in either Chapter 11, 12 or
13, the reorganization chapters, but cannot occur in a Chapter 7.
Discharge:
An official act of the bankruptcy court which absolves the debtor of
personal liability for any pre-petition debt (except certain debts such
as taxes, alimony, child support, fines, penalties and student loans).
Any unsecured debts will not be collectible from the debtor after the
discharge order. Any secured debts may only be enforced against the
collateral after the discharge.
Dismissal with Prejudice:
A dismissal with prejudice means that the bankruptcy case is dismissed
with an order preventing the debtor from refiling bankruptcy for a
period of time (usually 180 days). Bankruptcy cases dismissed with
prejudice are usually done so under Section 109(g) (1) or (2) of the
Bankruptcy Code. It is usually the several bankruptcy filers that have
their cases dismissed with prejudice to prevent a future filing within
180 days so that the creditor can finish a foreclosure or some other
collection activity. It is rare that a good faith filing will be
dismissed with prejudice. The serial filings can be evidence of bad
faith, and the debtor will be prevented from abusing the bankruptcy
process for at least 180 days.
ECF:
Electronic Case Filing.
Lien Stripping:
See Cram Down.
Meeting of Creditors:
Often referred to as the “341 meeting” that is conducted
under Bankruptcy Code section 341. In this meeting, the trustee and
creditors question the debtor about assets, liabilities, intentions
regarding secured property, as well as other related bankruptcy issues.
The debtor’s responses are given under oath.
Motion Requesting Relief from the Automatic
Stay:
A pleading filed in a bankruptcy case under Section 362(d) of the
Bankruptcy Code wherein the creditor requests that the automatic stay
provided under 362(a) of the Bankruptcy Code be terminated, annulled or
otherwise modified so that the creditor can commence or continue
pursuing its rights in the collateral securing the creditor’s
loan. Relief from the automatic stay in a Chapter 7 would usually be
granted if the total of the liens attaching to the collateral exceed the
fair market value of the collateral. In a Chapter 12 or 13 relief from
the automatic stay may be obtained usually if the debtor is not making
the post-petition monthly mortgage payments to the creditor.
Proof of Claim:
A proof of claim is an official signed statement filed in bankruptcy
court by a creditor which sets forth the amount of the arrearages and
total debt owed to the creditor as of the date the bankruptcy was filed.
In order to ensure that the creditor would be receive payment on its
claim in a Chapter 11, 12 or 13 it must file a Proof of Claim with the
bankruptcy court prior to the expiration of the bar date, or deadline,
to file such proof with the court. Unless the bankruptcy court holds
otherwise, once filed the Proof of Claim is deemed to be allowed by the
court. If the debt is secured by collateral it would be deemed an
allowed secured claim, and if the claim is unsecured it would be deemed
an allowed unsecured claim. In Chapters 12 and 13 usually the arrearage
portion of the Proof of Claim would be paid through the plan, and the
balance would be paid in accordance with the terms of the note and
mortgage. In a Chapter 11 the debtor could elect to pay the arrears
through the plan and the balance outside the plan in accordance with the
Promissory Note or pay the entire indebtedness over a period of time
through the Chapter 11 plan. Usually in a Chapter 7 Proofs of Claim are
not to be filed unless directed by the court to do so. In a Chapter 7
case where there are assets a Proof of Claim would be required. And in
that case the Chapter 7 trustee would liquidate the assets and
distribute the proceeds.
Reaffirmation:
A binding agreement between the debtor and creditor, which, if filed
with the bankruptcy court prior to the debtor’s discharge, will
make the creditor’s claim survive the discharge. Thus, the debtor
will remain personally liable for the obligation to the creditor
notwithstanding the discharge (unless the debtor rescinds the
Reaffirmation Agreement within 60 days after discharge enters or the
date the Reaffirmation Agreement is filed with the Court).
[Back to Top]
|